Jump to content


- - - - -

Female Disciples and Apostles of Christ


1 reply to this topic

#1 Aunt Clair

    Senior Member

  • Old Timers
  • 410 posts

Posted 11 April 2011 - 04:50 AM

Perhaps you like to edit Wikipedia articles too. When I Google and find omissions or errors I like to research and edit these.

Well this weekend , I discovered an article on Wikipedia concerning the Female Disciples of Jesus. And I added a lot of supporting links and I would like to share that here at Occult Corpus;


Some discoveries I have made recently include;

According to the Gnostic Apocrypha Pistis Sophia , Christ called 7 female apostles and a few of these are prevalent speakers in PS ; Mary Magdalene, Martha, Mary mother of Christ and Mary Salome.

Thecla and Mary Magdalene wrote apocryphal Gospels . But Thecla is also conjectured to have written the introductory chapters of the Acts of the Apostles and she definitely co-authored Acts of Paul and Thecla. She was a martyr for the church/

In Romans, Paul states that Junia is a prominent apostle . Junia is one of the founders of the church of Rome and was imprisoned as a Christian.

In the apocryphal Pistis Sophia Mary is honoured above all other apostles, "higher than the brethren. "

Also I came across material which suggests that John the apostle might have been the nephew of Christ. His father is Zebedee. His mother might be Mary Salome who
is suggested to be one of the sisters of Christ. Zebedee might be the brother of Joseph and this would make Mary Salome both daughter and sister in law to Mary mother of Christ.

Anyway more pertinent to the occult are the light mysteries of the Pistis Sophia which are a difficult to digest exegesis concerning the creation of the immortal light body and the Greater Soul or Magnum Opus.

What do you think about all of this ?

What is your opinion on female disciples and female apostles?

Edited by Aunt Clair, 12 April 2011 - 09:34 PM.


#2 ChaosTech

    All Religions' Wheel

  • Gold Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,357 posts
  • LocationThe end of Time

Posted 11 April 2011 - 08:00 AM

The Greater Soul as an immortal light body sounds dubious. A soul comes from the word, sol, which is a body of light, or a seperate light. Seperate light can't be immortal, as it is objective and not holistic. If there was a Greater Soul, it would be an inseperatable part of the unlimited, and so I don't really get the concept of soul. Not saying the unlimited is monistic one, as the concept of one is still a thing, but this seems like the closest resemblence of "it." As there is the whole of something, and then there is the parts.
http://cyberchaos.co.nf/ "Stop the cycle, be the circle." - Me





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users